<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Order Atarax - Lowest Prices Guaranteed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writingcities.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writingcities.net</link>
	<description>MIT-LSE-Harvard Graduate Students Conference</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Order Atarax - Lowest Prices Guaranteed</title>
		<link>http://writingcities.net/2008/05/02/a-few-more-themes/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliet Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writingcities.net//2008/05/02/a-few-more-themes/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>... and even some more themes..

Dear all,

Thanks for all the useful comments. Scanning through the list of papers, I it does seem a significant challenge to identify an overarching structure for the very diverse range of contributions. I agree that ‘metaphor’ may be a linking theme for a number of papers + I like Olivia’s suggestions about possible categories. 

Suzi’s ‘who decides’, ‘who participates’ and ‘who imagines’ sound very coherent- i can quite see those in print!

Other, perhaps dumber themes to link papers might be:  scale, boundary, memory, change, vision. These terms, whilst not perfect, begin to encompass the different ways in which we each spoke about relationships between the physical structure of the city (its impacts, etc), urban dynamics (including process and participation) and human perception/ experience (including imagination, metaphor, etc). 

In fact, come to think of it, the set of categories, in these terms, could as well be structures, dynamics and experiences….

In terms of organisation, I thought the suggestion to have a US/ UK editorial panel of 4-6 people sounded like a good idea….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and even some more themes..</p>
<p>Dear all,</p>
<p>Thanks for all the useful comments. Scanning through the list of papers, I it does seem a significant challenge to identify an overarching structure for the very diverse range of contributions. I agree that ‘metaphor’ may be a linking theme for a number of papers + I like Olivia’s suggestions about possible categories. </p>
<p>Suzi’s ‘who decides’, ‘who participates’ and ‘who imagines’ sound very coherent- i can quite see those in print!</p>
<p>Other, perhaps dumber themes to link papers might be:  scale, boundary, memory, change, vision. These terms, whilst not perfect, begin to encompass the different ways in which we each spoke about relationships between the physical structure of the city (its impacts, etc), urban dynamics (including process and participation) and human perception/ experience (including imagination, metaphor, etc). </p>
<p>In fact, come to think of it, the set of categories, in these terms, could as well be structures, dynamics and experiences….</p>
<p>In terms of organisation, I thought the suggestion to have a US/ UK editorial panel of 4-6 people sounded like a good idea….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Atarax - Lowest Prices Guaranteed</title>
		<link>http://writingcities.net/2008/04/28/session-1-icons-culture-branding-art/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecilia Dinardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writingcities.net//2008/04/28/session-1-icons-culture-branding-art/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Other themes that emerged from our discussion on this section were: commodification of culture along with commodification of space, the implications of city branding and the city as an "image package", the issues of access to resources in cities, as well as the idea of illusion and space, and the role of new digital technologies in urban planning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other themes that emerged from our discussion on this section were: commodification of culture along with commodification of space, the implications of city branding and the city as an &#8220;image package&#8221;, the issues of access to resources in cities, as well as the idea of illusion and space, and the role of new digital technologies in urban planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Atarax - Lowest Prices Guaranteed</title>
		<link>http://writingcities.net/2008/04/30/writing-cities-project/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Munoz-Rojas-Oscarsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writingcities.net//2008/04/30/writing-cities-project/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I think Suzi’s three questions are fundamental and implicitly also tackle the ‘whats’ and the ‘wheres,’ which I believe are important too. I agree with Melissa that the boundaries between decision making, participation (or practical involvement), and imagination are blurry, but I believe it is perhaps a matter of emphasis: each paper emphasised more one aspect or the other. 

About the ‘whats’ and the ‘wheres,’ some possible questions that are more or less explicitly addressed in our papers and discussions are: 

·	What are the broad themes in decisions about the city nowadays (achieving mixed communities, regenerating through culture, tackling violence, incorporating art to public space etc.)? 
·	What are the available mechanisms (Melissa) for residents’ involvement in these decisions (open source techniques, consultation, resistance)? 
·	What is actually being imagined in the early 21st century – green cities, Olympic cities, cultural capitals?
·	And does it matter where all this takes place – for example, does it matter if a city is post-colonial or post-metropolitan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Suzi’s three questions are fundamental and implicitly also tackle the ‘whats’ and the ‘wheres,’ which I believe are important too. I agree with Melissa that the boundaries between decision making, participation (or practical involvement), and imagination are blurry, but I believe it is perhaps a matter of emphasis: each paper emphasised more one aspect or the other. </p>
<p>About the ‘whats’ and the ‘wheres,’ some possible questions that are more or less explicitly addressed in our papers and discussions are: </p>
<p>·	What are the broad themes in decisions about the city nowadays (achieving mixed communities, regenerating through culture, tackling violence, incorporating art to public space etc.)?<br />
·	What are the available mechanisms (Melissa) for residents’ involvement in these decisions (open source techniques, consultation, resistance)?<br />
·	What is actually being imagined in the early 21st century – green cities, Olympic cities, cultural capitals?<br />
·	And does it matter where all this takes place – for example, does it matter if a city is post-colonial or post-metropolitan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Atarax - Lowest Prices Guaranteed</title>
		<link>http://writingcities.net/2008/04/30/writing-cities-project/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writingcities.net//2008/04/30/writing-cities-project/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>(typo): -Creating spaces of ‘belonging’ through particular MECHANISMS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(typo): -Creating spaces of ‘belonging’ through particular MECHANISMS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Atarax - Lowest Prices Guaranteed</title>
		<link>http://writingcities.net/2008/04/30/writing-cities-project/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writingcities.net//2008/04/30/writing-cities-project/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I'm (happily)haunted by Richard’s unrelenting “So what?”:-)
Some scattered thoughts:
 I agree with Tad in that 'participation' may not be the most useful concept through which to think about emergent themes, but rather that it's more about the particularities and ways in which new practices are getting played out.  I would, however, also steer away from concerns about how this is 'structural/structured' and focus more on how they are lived- wherever that may lead in individual projects.
I find Suzi's comments/notes very helpful-  though there may be quite a lot of overlap in the themes suggested, as 'deciding', 'participating' and 'imagining' may end up being one and the same thing, in some cases. As you say, maybe it's best to integrate bigger questions within those three themes. To her noted questions, I would add the over-arching phrases:
-In the production of culture, there's the contestation of the national/ recuperation of and allusion to certain or exclusive parts of culture; 
-Creating spaces of 'belonging' through particular 
Finally, beyond Tad's suggested 'citizen involvement' (or, in my case, frequent involvement through disinvolvement) in urban planning,the suggestive/provocative idea of thinking about ‘Cities and Metaphors’ historically and today may allow for:
- cultural, national, political, economic aspects to be variously addressed
-thinking through thematic divisions of workshop
-inclusion of the 'imagination' aspect
-can shed light on ‘branding’ and commodification phenomenon
-linguistic + visual to be addressed together
-iconography
 [[‘Constructing(or producing/creating/contesting) Cities: Practices and Metaphors’/ Cities: material constructions; metaphorical imaginations/ Cities : metaphors, materiality (or practices?), technology]]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m (happily)haunted by Richard’s unrelenting “So what?”:-)<br />
Some scattered thoughts:<br />
 I agree with Tad in that &#8216;participation&#8217; may not be the most useful concept through which to think about emergent themes, but rather that it&#8217;s more about the particularities and ways in which new practices are getting played out.  I would, however, also steer away from concerns about how this is &#8217;structural/structured&#8217; and focus more on how they are lived- wherever that may lead in individual projects.<br />
I find Suzi&#8217;s comments/notes very helpful-  though there may be quite a lot of overlap in the themes suggested, as &#8216;deciding&#8217;, &#8216;participating&#8217; and &#8216;imagining&#8217; may end up being one and the same thing, in some cases. As you say, maybe it&#8217;s best to integrate bigger questions within those three themes. To her noted questions, I would add the over-arching phrases:<br />
-In the production of culture, there&#8217;s the contestation of the national/ recuperation of and allusion to certain or exclusive parts of culture;<br />
-Creating spaces of &#8216;belonging&#8217; through particular<br />
Finally, beyond Tad&#8217;s suggested &#8216;citizen involvement&#8217; (or, in my case, frequent involvement through disinvolvement) in urban planning,the suggestive/provocative idea of thinking about ‘Cities and Metaphors’ historically and today may allow for:<br />
- cultural, national, political, economic aspects to be variously addressed<br />
-thinking through thematic divisions of workshop<br />
-inclusion of the &#8216;imagination&#8217; aspect<br />
-can shed light on ‘branding’ and commodification phenomenon<br />
-linguistic + visual to be addressed together<br />
-iconography<br />
 [[‘Constructing(or producing/creating/contesting) Cities: Practices and Metaphors’/ Cities: material constructions; metaphorical imaginations/ Cities : metaphors, materiality (or practices?), technology]]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
